Author :
Publisher :
Page : 41 pages
File Size : 44,62 MB
Release : 1995
Category :
ISBN :
[PDF] Defense Base Realignment And Closure Budget Data For Closing Naval Station Charleston South Carolina And Realigning Projects At Various Sites eBook
Defense Base Realignment And Closure Budget Data For Closing Naval Station Charleston South Carolina And Realigning Projects At Various Sites Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle version is available to download in english. Read online anytime anywhere directly from your device. Click on the download button below to get a free pdf file of Defense Base Realignment And Closure Budget Data For Closing Naval Station Charleston South Carolina And Realigning Projects At Various Sites book. This book definitely worth reading, it is an incredibly well-written.
Defense Base Realignment and Closure Budget Data for Closing Naval Air Station Cecil Field, Florida, and Realigning Projects to Various Sites
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 0 pages
File Size : 19,66 MB
Release : 1994
Category :
ISBN :
The overall audit objective was to determine the accuracy of Defense base realignment and closure military construction budget data. This report provides the results of the audit of seven projects, valued at $21.4 million, associated with the closure of Naval Air Station Cecil Field, Florida, and the realignment of aircraft and dedicated personnel, equipment, and support services to Naval Air Station Oceana, Virginia; Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, North Carolina; and Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort, South Carolina. Audit Results. For the seven projects, the Navy did not adequately determine the scope and the most economical way to accommodate the assigned mission. As a result, seven projects, estimated to cost $21.4 million, could not be validated and are therefore questionable. However, an economic analysis provided in response to a draft of this report, completed April 8, 1994, by the Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Services Operations) validated one project for $3.1 million. See the finding in Part II for details.
Semiannual Report to the Congress
United States. Dept. of Defense. Office of the Inspector General
Author : United States. Dept. of Defense. Office of the Inspector General
Publisher :
Page : 106 pages
File Size : 46,67 MB
Release : 1994
Category :
ISBN :
Defense Base Realignment and Closure Budget Data for Closing Mare Island Naval Shipyard, California, and Realigning Projects to Various Sites
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 28 pages
File Size : 46,57 MB
Release : 1994
Category :
ISBN :
Defense Base Realignment and Closure Budget Data for Naval Air Station Miramar, California, and Realigning Projects to Various Sites
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 28 pages
File Size : 18,33 MB
Release : 1994
Category :
ISBN :
Base Closure and Realignment Budget Data for the Naval Surface Warfare Center
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 0 pages
File Size : 36,75 MB
Release : 1993
Category :
ISBN :
Introduction. The audit was directed by Public Law 102-190, "National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1992 and 1993," December 5, 1991. The Public Law states that the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the amount of the authorization requested by DoD for each military construction project associated with base realignment and closure actions does not exceed the original estimated cost provided to the Base Closure and Realignment Commission (the Commission). The Secretary of Defense is required to explain to Congress the reasons for the differences between the original project cost estimate provided to the Commission and the requested budget amount. The Inspector General, DoD, is required to review each military construction project for which a significant difference exists and to provide the results of the review to the congressional Defense committees. This report is one in a series of reports relating to FY 1994 military construction costs for realigning and closing bases.
Defense Base Realignment and Closure Budget Data for the Medical and Dental Clinic Expansion Project at Naval Weapons Station Charleston, South Carolina
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 13 pages
File Size : 21,52 MB
Release : 1996
Category :
ISBN :
The overall audit objective was to determine the accuracy of BRAC MILCON budget data. The specific objectives were to determine whether the proposed project was a valid BRAC requirement, whether the decision for MILCON was supported with required documentation including an economic analysis, and whether the economic analysis considered existing facilities. Another objective was to assess the adequacy of the management control program as it applied to the overall audit objective. We did not assess the management control program as part of this audit, because it will be addressed in a summary report on FY 1997 BRAC MILCON budget data.
Defense Base Realignment and Closure Budget Data for Naval Air Station Miramar, California, Realigning to Naval Air Station Fallon, Nevada
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 30 pages
File Size : 46,89 MB
Release : 1994
Category :
ISBN :
The overall audit objective was to determine the accuracy of Defense base realignment and closure military construction budget data. This report provides the results of the audit of seven projects, valued at $46.9 million, for the realignment of the Naval Air Station Miramar, California, to Naval Air Station Fallon, Nevada. The audit also reviewed applicable internal controls.
Military Base Realignments and Closures: Estimated Costs Have Increased and Estimated Savings Have Decreased
Author :
Publisher : DIANE Publishing
Page : 26 pages
File Size : 33,76 MB
Release : 2007
Category :
ISBN : 9781422398661
The Department of Defense (DoD) is currently implementing recommendations from the 2005 Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) round, which is the fifth round undertaken by DoD since 1988. The 2005 round is, by GAO's assessment, the biggest, most complex, and costliest BRAC round ever, in part because, unlike previous rounds, the Secretary of Defense viewed the 2005 round as an opportunity not only to achieve savings but also to assist in transforming the department. GAO's testimony addresses the following: (1) GAO's role in the BRAC process, and (2) how DoD's current cost and savings estimates to implement the 2005 recommendations compare to the 2005 Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission's (the Commission) cost and savings estimates. This testimony is based primarily on the report GAO issued yesterday (GAO-08-159) on the overall changes to DoD's cost and savings estimates for the 2005 BRAC round. To analyze these changes, GAO compared the Commission's estimates in its 2005 report to DoD's estimates in its fiscal year 2008 BRAC budget submission. This testimony is also based on several reports GAO has issued on the implementation of selected recommendations, and GAO's prior work assessing the 2005 decision making process. GAO's work was performed in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards.
Defense Base Realignment and Closure Budget Data for Fort Jackson, South Carolina
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 32 pages
File Size : 39,17 MB
Release : 1995
Category :
ISBN :
Public Law 102-190, "National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1992 and 1993," December 5, 1991, directs the Secretary of Defense to ensure that the amount of the authorization that DoD requested for each military construction project associated with Defense base realignment and closure does not exceed the original estimated cost provided to the Commission on Defense Base Closure and Realignment (the Commission). If the requested budget amount exceeds the original project cost estimate provided to the Commission, the Secretary of Defense is required to explain to Congress the reasons for the difference. One reason for the difference is the rigid time constraint imposed on the Military Departments for developing cost estimates for base realignment and closure military construction. The Inspector General, DoD, is required to review each base realignment and closure military construction project for which a significant difference exists from the original cost estimate and to provide the results of the review to the congressional Defense committees. This report is one in a series of reports about military construction costs for FY 1996 Defense base realignment and closure.