Concise Treatise On The Law Of Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle version is available to download in english. Read online anytime anywhere directly from your device. Click on the download button below to get a free pdf file of Concise Treatise On The Law Of book. This book definitely worth reading, it is an incredibly well-written.
Unlike some other reproductions of classic texts (1) We have not used OCR(Optical Character Recognition), as this leads to bad quality books with introduced typos. (2) In books where there are images such as portraits, maps, sketches etc We have endeavoured to keep the quality of these images, so they represent accurately the original artefact. Although occasionally there may be certain imperfections with these old texts, we feel they deserve to be made available for future generations to enjoy.
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1901 edition. Excerpt: ...the will, either expressly or necessarily implied.55 Where this principle is not expressed in such sweeping language, it is always held by the courts where the will is equally susceptible of two constructions, one in favor of the heirs and the other in favor of some more distant relative, that the one in favor of the heir will be preferred.56 So in construing a will, the courts, in case of doubt, lean toward a construction which conforms as nearly as possible to the Statutes of Descent and Distribution.57 Thus, in a devise to testator's children in existence at the time of his death, it will be presumed that testator intended an equality of distribution among them.58 In the case of the death of some of testator's children, the law will, unless the contrary appear on the face of the will, assume that a distribution per stirpes in accordance with the principle of lineal representation is intended,58 if lapse is prevented in any way. "Tabor v. Mclntire, 79 Ky. 505. 499; Fahnestock's Estate, 147 Pa. B3 Pendleton v. Larrabee, 62 Conn. St. 327. 393; Wilder v. Holland, 102 Ga. 58 Pinkham v. Blair, 57 N. H. 44; Mathews v. Krishcr, 59 O. S. 226; Patterson's App., 128 Pa. St. 562; Bell's Estate, 147 Pa. St. 389, 269. 1892; 23 Atl. 577; Stewart's Es-on Doe v. Considine, 6 Wall. 458; tate, 147 Pa. St. 383. Dale V. White, 33 Conn. 294; Teele o Pendleton v. Larrabee, 62 Conn. v. Hathaway, 129 Mass. 164: Edger 393: Downing v. Bain, 24 Ga. 372; ly v. Barker, 66 N. H. 434: 28 L. Thompson v. Shackelford, 6 Tex. R. A. 328; Goebel v. Wolf, 113 N. Civ. App. 121. Y. 405; Dunlap's Appeal. 116 Pa. 57Geery v. Skelding, 62 Conn. St. 500; Chess's Appeal, 87 Pa. St. 362; 30 Am. Rep. 361. Where a residuary clause is capaMe of two constructions, one of...