[PDF] Time Lapse Approach To Monitoring Oil Gas And Co2 Storage By Seismic Methods eBook
Time Lapse Approach To Monitoring Oil Gas And Co2 Storage By Seismic Methods Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle version is available to download in english. Read online anytime anywhere directly from your device. Click on the download button below to get a free pdf file of Time Lapse Approach To Monitoring Oil Gas And Co2 Storage By Seismic Methods book. This book definitely worth reading, it is an incredibly well-written.
"Named ACROSS (Accurately Controlled and Routinely Operated Signal System), this new evaluation method is presented to address more complex reservoirs, such as shale and heavy oil. The book also discusses prolonged production methods for enhanced oil recovery. The monitoring of storage zones for carbon capture are also included, all helping the petroleum and reservoir engineer to fully extend the life of a field and locate untapped pockets of additional oil and gas resources. Rounded out with case studies from locations such as Japan, Saudi Arabia, and Canada, this book will help readers, scientists, and engineers alike to better manage the life of their oil and gas resources and reservoirs."--Provided by publisher
Time Lapse Approach to Monitoring Oil, Gas, and CO2 Storage by Seismic Methods delivers a new technology to geoscientists, well logging experts, and reservoir engineers, giving them a new basis on which to influence decisions on oil and gas reservoir management. Named ACROSS (Accurately Controlled and Routinely Operated Signal System), this new evaluation method is presented to address more complex reservoirs, such as shale and heavy oil. The book also discusses prolonged production methods for enhanced oil recovery. The monitoring of storage zones for carbon capture are also included, all helping the petroleum and reservoir engineer to fully extend the life of a field and locate untapped pockets of additional oil and gas resources. Rounded out with case studies from locations such as Japan, Saudi Arabia, and Canada, this book will help readers, scientists, and engineers alike to better manage the life of their oil and gas resources and reservoirs. Benefits both geoscientists and reservoir engineers to optimize complex reservoirs such as shale and heavy oil Explains a more accurate and cost efficient reservoir monitoring technology called ACROSS (Accurately Controlled and Routinely Operated Signal System) Illustrates real-world application through multiple case studies from around the world
I present an approach for seismic monitoring from sparse time-lapse data, with a particular focus on leak detection from CO2 storage reservoirs. I use sparse data because it is (1) faster and (2) less expensive to acquire and to process, permitting for more frequent monitoring surveys to be carried out. This would allow for (1) early leak detection, which is what we ultimately aim for at a storage site, and (2) timely assessment of performance conformance. To account for data sparsity, I incorporate information on the underlying (injection) process (pressure and flow) into the geophysical model estimation. By process information, I mean how the geophysical model is possibly or potentially perturbed due to CO2 injection, as governed by the physics of the flow and the rock properties model. I do that by reformulating the geophysical minimization problem with Reduced-Order Basis (ROB) functions that are derived from simulated training images stochastically describing how the geophysical model is perturbed by the CO2 injection including leak possibilities, which I will refer to as ROB-inversion. Naturally, reducing the spatial sampling of the acquired data leads to reduced spatial resolution of the reconstructed subsurface model. This is the tradeoff for the increased calendar-time resolution, i.e., the shorter monitoring calendar-time interval. By reformulating the geophysical minimization problem with the process-derived reduced-order basis functions, I can improve the spatial resolution of the subsurface model—leading to approximate (or reduced-order) models. The accuracy of the reduced-order models depends on how representative the training image set is to the true model change. A key point in my implementation is the formulation of the problem in terms of the changes in model and data—not in terms of model and data. This (1) focuses the inversion on the model change, making it easy to apply restrictions and limitations on the model change during seismic inversion; the ROB-inversion essentially restricts the model change to be in terms of the (process-derived) Reduced-Order Basis functions. Furthermore, it (2) allows for the training images to be defined explicitly in terms of the time-lapse changes to the baseline model. The change is generally constrained—by the physics of the flow and the rock properties model, making a representative training image set to be reasonably attainable. An advantage of my approach over existing sparse time-lapse techniques is that it allows for fixed data acquisition configurations over calendar-time. Hence, the cost and turn-around time associated with redeployment of seismic data acquisition equipment can be minimized. In order to demonstrate my approach, I focus on borehole-based monitoring, namely, crosswell data acquisition geometry; nevertheless, it can be adapted to other geometries (surface-based or borehole-based) and other geophysical data (e.g., resistivity, electromagnetic, etc.). It can also be adapted for monitoring other processes, such as assessing the performance of Improved Oil Recovery (IOR). In this thesis, I demonstrate the practicability of my approach on synthetic and field traveltime crosswell datasets. I show, with synthetic and field data, its effectiveness for leak detection during CO2 injection.
Active Geophysical Monitoring, Second Edition, presents a key method for studying time-evolving structures and states in the tectonically active Earth's lithosphere. Based on repeated time-lapse observations and interpretation of rock-induced changes in geophysical fields periodically excited by controlled sources, active geophysical monitoring can be applied to a variety of fields in geophysics, from exploration, to seismology and disaster mitigation. This revised edition presents the results of strategic systematic development and the application of new technologies. It demonstrates the impact of active monitoring on solid Earth geophysics, also delving into key topics, such as carbon capture and storage, geodesy, and new technological tools. This book is an essential for graduate students, researchers and practitioners across geophysics. Outlines the general concepts of active geophysical monitoring with powerful seismic vibrators and MHD generators Provides historical background for previous studies of seismically active zones Covers the theory and technology of active monitoring, including signal processing, data analysis, novel approaches to numerical modeling, and interpretation Discusses case histories and presents the results of worldwide, regional active monitoring experiments Thoroughly updated to include recent developments, such as updates relating to carbon capture and storage, microgravity, InSAR technologies, geodesy, reservoir monitoring, seismic reflection, and more
This project, 'Application of Time-Lapse Seismic Monitoring for the Control and Optimization of CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery Operations', investigated the potential for monitoring CO2 floods in carbonate reservoirs through the use of standard p-wave seismic data. This primarily involved the use of 4D seismic (time lapse seismic) in an attempt to observe and map the movement of the injected CO2 through a carbonate reservoir. The differences between certain seismic attributes, such as amplitude, were used for this purpose. This technique has recently been shown to be effective in CO2 monitoring in Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) projects, such as Weyborne. This study was conducted in the Charlton 30/31 field in the northern Michigan Basin, which is a Silurian pinnacle reef that completed its primary production in 1997 and was scheduled for enhanced oil recovery using injected CO2. Prior to injection an initial 'Base' 3D survey was obtained over the field and was then processed and interpreted. CO2 injection within the main portion of the reef was conducted intermittently during 13 months starting in August 2005. During this time, 29,000 tons of CO2 was injected into the Guelph formation, historically known as the Niagaran Brown formation. By September 2006, the reservoir pressure within the reef had risen to approximately 2000 lbs and oil and water production from the one producing well within the field had increased significantly. The determination of the reservoir's porosity distribution, a critical aspect of reservoir characterization and simulation, proved to be a significant portion of this project. In order to relate the differences observed between the seismic attributes seen on the multiple 3D seismic surveys and the actual location of the CO2, a predictive reservoir simulation model was developed based on seismic attributes obtained from the base 3D seismic survey and available well data. This simulation predicted that the CO2 injected into the reef would remain in the northern portion of the field. Two new wells, the State Charlton 4-30 and the Larsen 3-31, were drilled into the field in 2006 and 2008 respectively and supported this assessment. A second (or 'Monitor') 3D seismic survey was acquired during September 2007 over most of the field and duplicated the first (Base) survey, as much as possible. However, as the simulation and new well data available at that time indicated that the CO2 was concentrated in the northern portion of the field, the second seismic survey was not acquired over the extreme southern end of the area covered by the original (or Base) 3D survey. Basic processing was performed on the second 3D seismic survey and, finally, 4D processing methods were applied to both the Base and the Monitor surveys. In addition to this 3D data, a shear wave seismic data set was obtained at the same time. Interpretation of the 4D seismic data indicated that a significant amplitude change, not attributable to differences in acquisition or processing, existed at the locations within the reef predicted by the reservoir simulation. The reservoir simulation was based on the porosity distribution obtained from seismic attributes from the Base 3D survey. Using this validated reservoir simulation the location of oil within the reef at the time the Monitor survey was obtained and recommendations made for the drilling of additional EOR wells. The economic impact of this project has been estimated in terms of both enhanced oil recovery and CO2 sequestration potential. In the northern Michigan Basin alone, the Niagaran reef play is comprised of over 700 Niagaran reefs with reservoirs already depleted by primary production. Potentially there is over 1 billion bbls of oil (original oil in place minus primary recovery) remains in the reefs in Michigan, much of which could be more efficiently mobilized utilizing techniques similar to those employed in this study.
Current strategies and logistics for seismic data acquisition impose restrictions on the calendar-time temporal resolution obtainable for a given time-lapse monitoring program. One factor that restricts the implementation of a quasi-continuous monitoring program using conventional strategies is the time it takes to acquire a complete survey. Here quasi-continuous monitoring describes the process of reservoir monitoring at short time intervals. This dissertation describes an approach that circumvents the restriction by requiring only a subset of a complete survey data each time an image of the reservoir is needed. Ideally, the time interval between survey subset acquisitions should be short so that changes in the reservoir properties are small. The accumulated data acquired are used to estimate the unavailable data at the monitor survey time, and the combined known and estimated data are used to produce an image of the subsurface for monitoring. Quasi-continuous seismic monitoring can be used to monitor geologic reservoirs during the injection phase of a carbon dioxide sequestration project. It can also be used to monitor reservoir changes between injector and producer wells during the secondary recovery phase in an oil field. The primary advantage of a quasi-continuous monitoring strategy over the conventional strategy is the high temporal resolution of the reservoir changes obtainable. Naturally, the spatial resolution of the image obtained using a subset of the data from a full survey will be worse than the spatial resolution of the image obtained using the complete data from a full survey. However, if the unavailable data are estimated perfectly, the spatial resolution is not lost. The choice of estimation algorithm and the size of the known data play an important role in the success of the approach presented in this dissertation.
Time-lapse (4D) seismic technology is a key enabler for improved hydrocarbon recovery and more cost-effective field operations. This book shows how 4D data are used for reservoir surveillance, add value to reservoir management, and provide valuable insight on dynamic reservoir properties such as fluid saturation, pressure, and temperature.
Time-lapse seismic monitoring repeats 3D seismic imaging over a reservoir to map fluid movements in a reservoir. During hydrocarbon production, the fluid saturation, pressure, and temperature of a reservoir change, thereby altering the acoustic properties of the reservoir. Time-lapse seismic analysis can illuminate these dynamic changes of reservoir properties, and therefore has strong potential for improving reservoir management. However, the response of a reservoir depends on many parameters and can be diffcult to understand and predict. Numerical modeling results integrating streamline fluid flow simulation, rock physics, and ray-Born seismic modeling address some of these problems. Calculations show that the sensitivity of amplitude changes to porosity depend on the type of sediment comprising the reservoir. For consolidated rock, high-porosity models show larger amplitude changes than low porosity models. However, in an unconsolidated formation, there is less consistent correlation between amplitude and porosity. The rapid time-lapse modeling schemes also allow statistical analysis of the uncertainty in seismic response associated with poorly known values of reservoir parameters such as permeability and dry bulk modulus. Results show that for permeability, the maximum uncertainties in time-lapse seismic signals occur at the water front, where saturation is most variable. For the dry bulk-modulus, the uncertainty is greatest near the injection well, where the maximum saturation changes occur. Time-lapse seismic methods can also be applied to monitor CO2 sequestration. Simulations show that since the acoustic properties of CO2 are very different from those of hydrocarbons and water, it is possible to image CO2 saturation using seismic monitoring. Furthermore, amplitude changes after supercritical fluid CO2 injection are larger than liquid CO2 injection. Two seismic surveys over Teal South Field, Eugene Island, Gulf of Mexico, were acquired at different times, and the numerical models provide important insights to understand changes in the reservoir. 4D seismic differences after cross-equalization show that amplitude dimming occurs in the northeast and brightening occurs in the southwest part of the field. Our forward model, which integrates production data, petrophysicals, and seismic wave propagation simulation, shows that the amplitude dimming and brightening can be explained by pore pressure drops and gas invasion, respectively.