Author :
Publisher :
Page : 24 pages
File Size : 36,46 MB
Release : 1975
Category :
ISBN :
[PDF] Rodriguez V Hoeft eBook
Rodriguez V Hoeft Book in PDF, ePub and Kindle version is available to download in english. Read online anytime anywhere directly from your device. Click on the download button below to get a free pdf file of Rodriguez V Hoeft book. This book definitely worth reading, it is an incredibly well-written.
Rodriguez V. Hoeft
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 26 pages
File Size : 42,75 MB
Release : 1975
Category :
ISBN :
Rodriguez V. Cady
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 20 pages
File Size : 11,90 MB
Release : 1972
Category :
ISBN :
Rodriguez V. United States Parole Commission
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 22 pages
File Size : 28,85 MB
Release : 1978
Category :
ISBN :
Rodriguez V. Trost
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 16 pages
File Size : 12,47 MB
Release : 1979
Category :
ISBN :
United States of America V. Rodriguez
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 98 pages
File Size : 28,73 MB
Release : 1995
Category :
ISBN :
United States ex rel. Rodriguez v. Hughes, et. al.
Author : Paul J. Zwier
Publisher : Aspen Publishing
Page : 354 pages
File Size : 29,24 MB
Release : 2016-11-09
Category : Law
ISBN : 1601565267
NITA would like to acknowledge that this case file was produced through Emory’s Center for Advocacy and Dispute Resolution, with a special thanks to Reuben Guttman and the firm of Grant & Eisenhofer for their help in authoring the materials. The four case files of United States ex rel. Rodriguez v. Hughes, et al. explore the suit brought by Juan Rodriguez, a prominent engineer, who acted as a whistleblower against his employer, Hughes Aircraft, for violations of the False Claims Act. Richard Hughes (CEO of Hughes Aircraft) learned that the United States Department of Defense (DOD) was looking for a new helicopter to provide to the Mexican government as part of the United States' Mérida Initiative, which provided Mexico resources to help it fight its war against the drug cartels. Hughes, on behalf of Hughes Aircraft, entered into a sole source contract with the DOD. Hughes was favorably positioned to do so as it was the sole manufacturer of the Screaming Eagle helicopter S-70, the model the DOD was seeking to purchase. Rodriguez's employment background put him in a position to ascertain whether his employer, Hughes Aircraft, was making false claims to the DOD. Initially, Rodriguez had been employed at Sikorsky Aircraft Inc., a predecessor of Hughes, working in the design and manufacture of the first Screaming Eagle helicopters. Later Sikorsky Aircraft was bought by Hughes Aircraft. During his tenure at Hughes, Rodriguez had designed and retrofitted early versions of the Screaming Eagle helicopter. When retrofitted with heavy missiles, one of the first versions, the UH-A, suffered cracks on landing. Accordingly, metals intended to help crash-proof the helicopter were added to the design. Hughes also started to employ Magnaflux testing to ensure that later versions of the Screaming Eagle did not have subsurface cracks. Rodriguez claims that he saw cracks in the cabin of one of the Screaming Eagles Mexico helicopters, and that he also saw workers welding over the cracks. Rodriguez claimed that he considered the welding over of cracks in the cabin of the Screaming Eagle a "cover up" of the failure to conduct testing and thus an act of fraud—passing on defective helicopters to the governments of the United States and Mexico.
The Federal Reporter
Author :
Publisher :
Page : 1612 pages
File Size : 18,34 MB
Release : 1977
Category : Law reports, digests, etc
ISBN :
Official Reports of the Supreme Court
Author : United States. Supreme Court
Publisher :
Page : 730 pages
File Size : 47,70 MB
Release : 2007-02
Category : Constitutional law
ISBN :
Rodriguez V. United States
Author : United States. District Court (Florida : Southern District)
Publisher :
Page : pages
File Size : 38,45 MB
Release : 1997
Category : Florida
ISBN :
Clearinghouse case IM-FL-0015. On April 23, 1997, two different groups of plaintiffs filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida to challenge a provision of the Congress2 Personal ... Additional Detail Found in Record.