Author : Sosoka & Associates
Publisher :
Page : 88 pages
File Size : 48,52 MB
Release : 1983
Category : Geothermal space heating
ISBN :
The purpose of this study was to determine the economics of converting the main building and the annex of the Cal Trans facility in San Bernardino from natural gas to geothermal fluids. The heat from the geothermal fluid would be used for space and domestic hot water heating. Two basic design approaches were developed for the space heating systems. One design allowed the geothermal fluids to circulate directly through the existing heating system. It was believed that this was a feasible approach because of the unusually high quality of the geothermal fluid. The alternate design incorporated a flat plate heat exchanger to isolate the geothermal fluid from the closed loop heating system. In the case of the domestic hot water the designs included double walled heat exchangers to comply with the normal code requirements. These heat exchangers are the same type that are used for solar heating systems. As a result of this study it is recommended that only the space heating system for the main building be retrofitted for geothermal at this time. The distance of the annex from the main building and the geothermal mains in Arrowhead Avenue and Second Street is a major factor in making this building a poor application. Also contributing to the poor economics is the fact that the annex is a relatively small building and the potential utility savings is correspondingly small. Retrofit of the domestic hot water for the main building is also not recommended at this time because of the poor return on investment. The piping for the space heating system will be sized so that the domestic hot water system can be converted at a later date without any penalty. Fortunately the boiler and water heaters are in close proximity. While the direct use of geothermal water in the space heating system has a better return on investment (29%), it is recommended that the isolated system using the heat exchanger be installed. While the return on investment is less (16%), it avoids any potential problems from the geothermal fluid in the system. After sufficient operating experience has been obtained with the geothermal fluid it may be possible to recommend that future systems be designed without the isolation heat exchanger.